Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> The UCL Practitioner
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: The UCL Practitioner"Hydrogen Bomb"
By Kimberly A. Kralowec
Professor Linda S. Mullenix of the University of Texas School of Law has an article in today's Recorder on the Third Circuit's recent class certification decision, In re Hyrdogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, ___ F.3d ___, 2008 WL 5411562 (3d Cir. Dec. 30, 2008). In my original blog post on this case, I pointed out that the standards it enunciates do not reflect California (or even Ninth Circuit) law, but the decision is nonetheless quite interesting.
Full post as published by The UCL Practitioner on February 11, 2009 (boomark / email).

US Patent 7326605 - Conversion of metallic CNTs to semiconducting CNTs using hydrogen doping
US Patent 7344725 - Inorganic nanoparticles for stabilizing hydrogen peroxide
US Patent 7367215 - Nanowire antifuse hydrogen sensor
US Patent 7389671 - Ultrafast palladium nanocluster sensor
Hydrogen cars cross US (well....about 2/3 of it)








