Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Malpractice Blogs -> New York Attorney Malpractice Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Malpractice
: New York Attorney Malpractice BlogJudiciary Law 487 and the Court of Appeals
By (Andrew Lavoott Bluestone)
We've written about Judiciary Law section 487 before, and have an article in the New York Law Journal awaiting publication. Like an appellate litigant who reads a new and important case the morning of oral argument, we came across the Amalfitano v. Rosenberg case from the Court of Appeals today. It is an opinion that traces the statute back to 1275 and the time of the Magna Carta (1215) Remembering that our law derives from the Norman conquest (1066); that's really a long time ago.
In Amalfitano v. Rosenberg the court first re-itereated the ancient origins of this statute, which they determined was "the modern day counterpart of a statute dating from the first decades after Magna Carta, its language virtually (and remarkably) unchanged from that of a law adopted by New York's Legislature two years before the United States Constitution was ratified."
They traced the law from the First Statute of Westminster, adopted by the "Parliament summoned by King Edward of England in 1275." 500 years later, the NY Legislature adopted a law almost identical in 1787. (L 1787, ch 36, section 5)
The statute followed, and continued through a series of statutory revisions to today's Judiciary Law section 487.
Tomorrow: the history through the 1800's to today and application in state and federal courts.
Full post as published by New York Attorney Malpractice Blog on February 16, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.

Committee on the Judiciary v. Harriet Miers:
State of the Judiciary and Court of Appeals
Sen. Orring Hatch: Senate Democrats are failing to meet historical and their own standards.
More Statistics From the 2007-08 Annual Report of the Tennessee Judiciary







