Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Charles A. Krugel, Labor & Employment Law, HR Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: Charles A. Krugel, Labor & Employment Law, HR Law2/17/09 Discussion With U.S. Congressman Peter Roskam (R, 6th Dist., IL) Regarding the Employee Free Choice Act
By charlesakrugel
Today, about 25 business people & I attended a roundtable discussion with U.S. Congressman Peter Roskam (R-IL, 6th District, O’Hare Suburbs; DuPage County) regarding the increasingly controversial Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA).
It was a fantastic & frank forum. The animus against this act was palpable in the room; as was Congressman Roskam’s.
From a management perspective, this is one scary bill. It basically calls for non-secretive union elections (union elections are currently secret ballot) & permits 3rd party arbitrators to impose contractual terms on the parties, if they’re unable to agree on a contract.
The law passed easily through the House of Representatives during the last Congressional session, so it will probably pass through the House this session again. The Senate seems to be a tougher call because according to Congressman Roskam, there are some Republicans like Pennsylvania’s Arlen Specter who are currently in favor of it.
My concern isn’t an increase in the number of union employees in the private sector, which many critics argue will happen (I don’t think this is a given because private sector union membership has been in decline for decades & labor seems unable to get its act together). My concern is that along with the EFCA & other laws already signed by President Obama (recent Executive Orders (see Project Labor Agreements & Non-Displacement of Workers), the costs to manage union election campaigns will greatly increase (I’m talking about prevention, avoidance & decertification campaigns) & stifle innovation due to draconian rules enforced by unions (even at the expense of labor).
Also, the possibility of increased labor costs in the public sector, due to these same recently enacted laws, may increase the cost of private sector labor, and render us non-competitive in foreign markets as well as increasing outsourcing to those markets. One fear of many opponents of EFCA, as well as other similar laws is that manufacturers will leave the U.S.
Hopefully, if the law does pass, then Congress will similarly allow the same process for union decertification elections.
Full post as published by Charles A. Krugel, Labor & Employment Law, HR Law on February 17, 2009 (boomark / email).
Employee Lawsuits (An Introduction and Topic Overview)
How employers can cope with the siege of employee lawsuits
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Westinghouse
alleging that former Westinghouse employees are being deprived of a choice in health care prescription plan benefits that were formerly available to them through union bargaining.
Oppenheimer ATM-Free New York Municipals
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.
TransUnion
Class action credit practices suit offers free credit monitoring services for millions.

'Free choice' versus binding arbitration
Momentum for Employee Free Choice Keeps Growing
Congressmen Criticize U.S. Trade Representative over Special 301 Report
Will the Employee Free Choice Act undermine free choice
Blawg of the Day -- Employee Free Choice Act Blog








