Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation BlogAmendments to Chancery Court Rules
By Francis G. X. Pileggi, Esq.
The Delaware Chancery Court, by Order available here, has amended Chancery Court Rules 3(aa) and 15(c), effective March 2, 2009. The text of the Order is so short, I will repeat it verbatim:
This 31st day of December, 2008, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court of Chancery Rule 3(aa) is amended by deleting the first sentence of Rule 3(aa) in its entirety and substituting in place of the first sentence the following language, which shall be effective Monday, March 2, 2009.
Rule 3(aa)
All complaints, counterclaims , cross-claims and third-party complaints, and any amendments thereto, shall be verified by each of the parties filing such pleading.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Court of Chancery Rule 15 (c)(3) shall be amended by deleting subparagraph (c)(3) in its entirety and substituting in its place the following language , which shall become effective March 2, 2009.
Rule 15(c)(3)
The amendment changes the party or the name of the party against whom a claim is asserted if the foregoing provisions of subdivision (2) of this paragraph are satisfied and, within 120 days of the filing of the complaint , or such additional time the Court allows for good cause shown, the party to be brought in by amendment.
The change to Chancery Court Rule 3(aa) makes it clear that not only do complaints need to be verified, but so too counterclaims, cross-claims, third-party complaints, and any amendments thereto.
The change to Rule 15(c)(3) refers to a new limit of 120 days from the filing of the complaint (with exceptions) as a deadline for when amendments that change the party or the name of the party will relate back to the date of the original pleading.
"All ye who labor" in the vineyards of Delaware corporate/business litigation, be forewarned.
UPDATE/CLARIFICATION: The Chancellor sent an email today to members of the Delaware Bar, shortly after the above Order was circulated by email, to provide clarification about the referenced amendment to Rule 15(c)(3). His Honor's email follows verbatim.
To all members of the Bar:
This is to clarify one possible ambiguity regarding the Chancery Rule 15(c)(3) amendment that you just received today via the DSBA's List Service. The Court of Chancery only amended the introductory paragraph to Rule 15(c)(3), beginning with the words "the amendment" and ending with the words "by amendment". Nothing in the amendment to the introductory paragraph of Chancery Rule 15(c)(3) was intended to alter or modify the remaining subparagraphs (A) and (B) to Rule 15(c)(3). Those subparagraphs remain unchanged.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Bill Chandler
Full post as published by Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog on February 24, 2009 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.

Ind. Courts - More on: Proposed amendments to Court rules
Delaware Chancery Rules in Merrill Lynch vs. BofA
Amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
Ind. Courts - Proposed amendments to Court rules
Ohio "commercial docket" Rules of Superintendence/ Criminal & Civil Procedure, including EDD








