Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Misleading Advertising Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Misleading Advertising LawHow Does the New Civil Procedure affect Franchisees
Image via Wikipedia
The new recommendations for change in the Ontario Civil procedure can be read here.
Here are some changes that are important to franchisees.
Small Claims
1. The monetary jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court should be increased to $25,000. The increase should be staged. The court's monetary jurisdiction should be increased immediately to $15,000 with a further increase to $25,000 within two years.
This will make it easier to contest supplier issues, because the small claims procedures do not require a lawyer.
Simplified Rules
2, The monetary jurisdiction of rule 76 should increase to $100,000 on a province-wide basis, to be implemented as soon as practicable.
3. Upon any increase to the monetary limit of rule 76, each party should be permitted to engage in up to two hours of discovery after giving due consideration to the cost of discovery in relation to the amounts or issues at stake.
4. The summary trial option should remain in place for all simplified procedure cases. It should, however, be amended to permit a brief opportunity for examination-in-chief or general statement of any party who has sworn an affidavit for the summary trial. I would allocate no more than 10 minutes for this statement or examination-in-chief, subject to an order of the pre-trial judge or master or the trial judge to extend this time.
This is a very important change because it brings a quick and affordable trial option for claims under $100,000.
Many section 6 or section 7 claims against the franchisor might be resolved using an action started under the simplified rules in a cost effective manner.
When you consider that often there are several parties to the franchise agreement, each with their own $100,000 limit, this change is very favourable for the litigant who cannot afford the costs of full blown discovery.
Related articles by ZemantaResolving Lawsuits Faster And More Affordably (newswire.ca)Ontario raises Small Claims Court limit (thestar.com)How To File A Lawsuit [Lawsuits] (consumerist.com)Full post as published by Misleading Advertising Law on March 04, 2009 (boomark / email).
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Gay Marriage Laws
Where same sex couples can marry
Ford F-150 Recall
alleging a hose in the F-150 and Lincoln Mark LT pickup trucks could affect braking power.
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty >
Faulty Homes
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc. pays HUD $75,000 civil penalty for defective construction.
Health Plan Boycott
Connecticut chiropractic groups to pay $87,000 fine in civil suit.
Becker County
Faces Civil Rights Class Action by Inmates and their Attorneys

SSRN DATABASE 'LAW AND SOCIETY : CIVIL PROCEDURE
Foundation Press Publishes Civil Procedure Stories, 2d Edition
AALS Civil Procedure Section Seeks Information about Future Conferences
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Online Resources
MBE may add civil procedure questions
Christmas presents for civil procedure fans









