ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer

Recent Supreme Court Ruling Bring Back Issue of Medical Devices

By Greg Webb

ADVERTISEMENTS

The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that consumers can sue drug makers for defective warnings, though earlier ruled consumers cannot sue medical device manufacturers if the device was FDA approved. This seemingly contradictory ruling claims federal law does not protect drug companies from product liability suits in state courts, though it earlier decided federal law prevents lawsuits against the manufacturers of such medical devices as heart stints and artificial joints. In the drug maker case, the defendant, drug manufacturer Wyeth, argued federal oversight of drug labels by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) precluded state courts from hearing drug injury lawsuits; the Court ruled, however, that consumers may sue the manufacturer in state court for a defective warning. The Court distinguishes the two cases by pointing out that there are different legal issues involved.

Experts believe that after this decision, there may be an influx in the amount of lawsuits drug makers will face because the FDA approved label will not provide a cover for the industry. Drug maker supporters fear the verdict could make companies more reluctant to produce beneficial drugs if the drugs pose a high risk. The decision could also offer support to some members of Congress who are planning to introduce a bill that would supersede the Court's medical device ruling, thus allowing injured people or their survivors to sue faulty device makers. Many hope the outcome will lead to more updated labels of possible side effects, though it would require FDA approval every time.

The Wyeth ruling was a victory for consumers – for normal citizens. It was a blow to big business, especially the pharmaceutical industry. If it could, the pharmaceutical industry would have the federal government give it blanket immunity from any law suits, no matter how egregious its conduct. Because the FDA is unable to adequately police the pharmaceutical industry (for a variety of reasons, including funding), one of the most effective checks on that industry is the product liability lawsuit. Wyeth gave this writer hope that that our Court is not turning into the 'Corporation Court', rubber-stamping whatever the industry wants.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Greg Webb

Full post as published by Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer on March 21, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0132 secs (new cache)