Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IPKatBREAKING NEWS: CFI ruling in latest BUDWEISER battle
By Johanna Gibson, David Pearce, Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Simon.
Via the IPKat's Bloomberg friend Stephanie Bodoni comes news that Anheuser-Busch InBev NV has just lost its bid to secure a Community trade mark right to the name Budweiser for beer across the region's 27 nations in its long-running fight with Budejovicky Budvar (Case T-191/07 Anheuser-Busch v OHIM - Budejovicky Budvar (BUDWEISER), still not available on the Curia website at the time this note was posted). According to information received, "The European Court of First Instance ... dismissed the case ..., ruling that Anheuser-Busch's existing rights in some EU countries can't be extended to the entire region because Budvar had the right to use the Budweiser trade mark for alcoholic beverages in Germany and Austria.
... Anheuser-Busch InBev, which in November completed a $52 billion acquisition of Anheuser-Busch ..., owns the rights to Bud or Budweiser in 23 of the EU's 27 nations. Its efforts to get the EU-wide rights have failed in some nations due to Budvar's claims.
...
Anheuser-Busch, which first applied for the EU-wide rights for the Budweiser beer name 13 years ago, took its fight to the region's main appeals court after Europe's trade mark agency in 2007 rejected the company's bid. The decision had been based on largely irrelevant documents by Czech rival Budvar to block the EU right, Anheuser-Busch had argued.
None of Budweiser s existing trade mark rights in Europe will be cancelled by today's ruling...".Without sight of the decision, the IPKat feels it would be unwise to comment. He suspects though that there might just be an appeal, given the value of a BUDWEISER Community trade mark to Anheuser-Busch and the possibility of the European Court of Justice clarifying the position on the evidential value of advertisements and invoices as proof of use.
Full post as published by IPKat on March 25, 2009 (boomark / email).
Katrina Victims See Justice, Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Katrina Victims See Justice Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Sheriff Interfered With Custody Battle
Greene County to pay $85,000 settlement in trespassing lawsuit.
Excessive Arrest
City of Worcester agrees to pay pizza vendor $100,000 settlement after breaking nine bones in his face.
Murphy City, TX
$255,000 settlement in controversial pedophile news program case.
Newspaper Employees
Chinese Daily News must pay $5.19 million class action settlement for failing to pay overtime.

US brewer loses latest battle over Budweiser name
Budweiser Lost EU Trademark Battle
Budweiser v Budweiser in Europe
IP matters associated with InBev takeover of Anheuser-Busch
"Beyond the Breaking Splendour of the Years"









