Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense WeeklyHarbison v. Bell
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The Court today released Harbison v. Bell. The nutshell holding of the case is that federally funded counsel can do state clemency proceedings. The 7-2 opinion reads provides a lot of great verbage. The real joy of the opinion, however, is Justice Scalia’s dissent in which he lays into Congress for reasons that most of us know, the AEDPA is — in the words of that Justice, “shoddy.”
The best I can tell, a broad majority of the Court has now declared Congress did a poor job in adopting the AEDPA. With both right and left on the Court indicating that the AEDPA is a “sow’s ear,” McFarland v. Scott, or otherwise written in a “shoddy” manner, this maybe the year where Congress’s finally fixes the AEDPA.continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on April 01, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Bell Canada
allegedly throttling internet speeds
Preliminary $1M Settlement Reached in Bell Canada Late Fees Class Action
Preliminary $1M Settlement Reached in Bell Canada Late Fees Class Action
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Adam Liptak on Harbison v. Bell
Argument Preview: Harbison v. Bell
Supreme Court Victory in Harbison v. Bell
Statutory interpretation at center of debate in SCOTUS clemency case








