ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates

U.S. Court of Appeals Rejects ThirdWave/Hologic's Anti-Trust Claims Against QIAGEN

By Philip Brooks

ADVERTISEMENTS

The following is excerpted from an April 1, 2009 QIAGEN press release that appeared at GlobeNewswire:

QIAGEN Gaithersburg Inc. (formerly Digene Corporation), a wholly-owned subsidiary of QIAGEN N.V. (Nasdaq:QGEN) (Frankfurt:QIA) today announced the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) denied an appeal by ThirdWave Technologies Inc. ("ThirdWave"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hologic, Inc. (Nasdaq:HOLX) and affirmed a lower court decision which was favorable for QIAGEN.

The CAFC denied a ThirdWave cross-appeal of the antitrust decision in favor of QIAGEN and upheld a January 2008 ruling by Judge Barbara B. Crabb of U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Judge Crabb dismissed the antitrust claims against QIAGEN, noting that QIAGEN "is selling a product that many customers prefer over the product the defendant is selling, with the not surprising result that defendant has not captured as many customers as it wishes it had."

In their ruling, the judges noted that "The district court also correctly found the contracts did not have an anti-competitive effect: Instead; as Digene (now QIAGEN Gaithersburg) points out and ThirdWave does not dispute, the vast majority of Digene's (now QIAGEN Gaithersburg) contracts were entered into after ThirdWave was already competing on the market, (...)".

The Federal Circuit also ruled on QIAGEN's patent infringement appeal against ThirdWave, denying the appeal. QIAGEN had alleged that ThirdWave's Invader(r) HPV Oligo Mix product violates one of QIAGEN's exclusive patents. QIAGEN's exclusive IP on HPV 68 is not affected by this decision.

Read the full press release here.

Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on April 01, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0151 secs (new cache)