ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer

Medtronic Heart Device Linked To a Possible Thirteen Deaths

By Greg Webb

ADVERTISEMENTS

Medtronic admitted that at least thirteen people might have died in correlation with a heart device, known as Sprint Fidelis, that it recalled in 2007 but was still in widespread use. This number includes four patients who died while surgeons were attempting to remove the product and is the first new data to reflect fatalities since the device was first recalled; the other nine deaths may be tied to the device's failure to work properly. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has also said it received about 2,200 reports of serious injuries related to the device. The heart device is a thin electrical cable that connects an implanted defibrillator to the patient's heart. It was recalled due to fractures in the cable that may cause the defibrillator to fire for no reason or fail to deliver a life saving shock to a patient's irregular beating heart. Presently about 150,000 patients still have the Sprint Fidelis leads in their bodies.

A previously disclosed Food and Drug Administration (FDA) report shows Medtronic began receiving reports about the problem in 2004, three years before they declared a recall; they even conducted their own internal investigations. This report is based on a visit by regulators to the Medtronic facility soon after the device was taken off the market, where officials interviewed executives and reviewed records. The company also changed their manufacturing process in the months leading up to taking the device off the market. A top Medtronic official, however, claims this 'acute' change had nothing to do with the recall and even at the time of the recall, internal data did not suggest the device was fracturing at higher rates than other company leads.

By 2006, it is believed Medtronic knew there was a problem. The timeline regarding exactly when Medtronic knew about the problems with Sprint Fidelis could be a significant factor if patient lawsuits begin again. The Supreme Court recently agreed that patients may not sue device manufacturers whose products were approved by the FDA, however, new legislation introduced by Democrats in Congress may nullify this decision.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Greg Webb

Full post as published by Charlottesville Personal Injury Lawyer on April 06, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0187 secs (new cache)