ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates

Modavox Pleased With New York District Court Markman Hearing Ruling

By Philip Brooks

ADVERTISEMENTS

The following is excerpted from a March 27, 2009 Modavox press release at PR Newswire:

Modavox, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: MDVX), Internet broadcasting pioneer and holder of several patented technologies, today announced that a decision has been reached by Hon. Colleen McMahon in the Southern District Court of New York in its patent infringement lawsuit vs. Tacoda, Inc., filed on August 9, 2007 seeking injunctive relief and unspecified damages.

In patent litigation, Markman hearings are used for claim construction. Typically, the plaintiff and defendant set out a list of claim terms whose definitions are in dispute. To clarify the meaning of these terms (and subsequently the scope and validity of the patents), a judge weighs evidence and definitions as presented by the plaintiff and defendant and makes a ruling in the form of a Markman Order.

The five terms disputed within the claims construction and presented at the Markman Hearing have been ruled upon by the Court. Modavox is pleased with the Judge's analysis believing the results fully support the Company's infringement contentions while reinforcing its patent enforcement strategy. The judge has also provided additional time for the inclusion of expert testimony and introduction of extrinsic evidence regarding the term 'functionality'. Modavox is further pleased with this ruling in addition to the schedule put forth by the court. The Company is actively preparing its response in accordance with the Court's scheduling order and looks forward to having experts work with its counsel, Shaub & Williams LLP, to further support the remaining term definition.

See the full press release here.

Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on April 09, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/03/26 10:58:45)