Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Journals Blogs -> Conflict of Laws
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Journals
: Conflict of LawsArticle on Google Book Search Settlement
By Veronika Gaertner
Yesterday’s issue of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) contains an interesting article on the Google Book Search Settlement written by Prof. Burkhard Hess:
The settlement concerns a class action lawsuit between Google and - as plaintiffs - the Authors Guild, the Association of American Publishers as well as individual authors and publishers about books scanned for the Google Book Search without the authors’ consent. Basically, the proposal for the settlement provides on the one side the payment of compensation for class members and the establishment of a registry of rights to books while it contains on the other side an authorisation of Google to scan books, maintain an electronic database and to make worldwide commercial uses of books.
The problematic issue the present article is dealing with, is the opt-out-mechanism provided by the settlement: Authors who do not object within the opt-out deadline (which has been extended until 4 September 2009) will be bound by the settlement. Thus, authors are “compelled” to take action if they don’t want to be bound by the settlement. In other words - the opt-out mechanism is meant to substitute the authors’ consent in the digitalisation and marketing of their books.
Hess points out in his article that the strategy of an opt-out mechanism might involve difficulties in view of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works since this Convention guarantees a certain minimum standard of protection: In his article, Hess raises doubts whether the opt-out mechanism - which would lead to an automatic deprivation of the authors’ copyright - meets the requirements of this protection standard.
With regard to the fairness hearing - which will take place in New York on 3 September - Hess suggests that it is not only the concerned authors who should intervene - rather he suggests that also the German Federal Government could do so, as an amicus curiae, in order to submit the reservations against the settlement.
The article titled “Es wird Zeit, dass die Bundesregierung eingreift” can be found (in German) also online on the website of the FAZ.
Related posts:
- German Article on the Procedure for a Declaration of Enforceability under the Brussels Regulation Burkhard Hess and David Bittmann (both Heidelberg) have published...
- German Article on Rome II Regulation Thomas Thiede and Markus Kellner (both Vienna) have written an...
- Conference: Croatia on its Way to the European Judicial Area ? Settlement of Commercial and Consumer Disputes The conference is organized by the Institute of European Law...
Full post as published by Conflict of Laws on May 08, 2009 (boomark / email).
Google
Settles Book-Scanning Class Actions for $125 Million
ASMP and Other Visual Artists File Class Action Lawsuit Against Google
Google Faces Class Action for Copyright Infringement
Amazon
Facing Class Action over Book Deletions
Ram Publishing
alleging phone book advertising contract fraud.
Strip Search Class Action Settled for $900,000
Strip Search Class Action Settled for $900,000
Strip-Search Lawsuit Settled for $1.1 Million
Strip-Search Lawsuit Settled for $1.1 Million

Grimmelmann on the Google Book Settlement
Google Reaches Tentative Settlement of Book Search Copyright Class Action
The Google Book Search Settlement: A New Orphan-Works Monopoly
On the Google Book Search Settlement
Antitrust Updates: Google Book Search; Section 2 Symposium; The Mediated Book








