Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Food Liability Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Food Liability Law BlogJudge Denies Class Action Status in McDonald's French Fry and Hash Brown Litigation
By Kenneth Odza
A lawsuit claiming that McDonald's deceived the public about ingredients in its french fries and hash browns will not proceed as a class action. A federal judge in Chicago has denied the plaintiffs' motion for class certification, characterizing the proposed class and subclasses as 'too indefinite and overbroad.'
According to the court's opinion, the potato suppliers who provide McDonald's with its french fries and hash browns par-fry the potatoes in oil made of 99 percent vegetable oil and one percent natural beef flavor. The beef flavor is partly made from wheat bran and casein (a dairy product). McDonald's restaurants then fry the potatoes in 100% vegetable oil prior to serving the products to customers. Plaintiffs allege that McDonald's falsely claimed its french fries and hash browns were gluten, wheat, and dairy-free. They say that they never would have purchased the potato products if they knew that the fries and hash browns were partially fried in oil containing wheat bran and casein. McDonald's corrected its disclosure in 2006.
The plaintiffs proposed a class consisting of all persons residing in the United States who purchased McDonald's french fries or hash browns between February 2002 and February 2006 and who, at the time of purchase, had been diagnosed with celiac disease, galactosemia, autism, and/or wheat, gluten, or dairy allergies.
In rejecting class certification, U.S. District Judge Elaine Bucklo noted that none of the plaintiffs has suffered any physical injury from eating the potato products; indeed, she noted that 'plaintiffs testified in their depositions that they were quite satisfied with the Potato Products they consumed.' Additionally, Judge Bucklo noted that proving economic damage would be an 'evidentiary headache' because the court would be required to review potentially millions of letters proving plaintiffs' medical diagnoses and the damage to each potential class member would be nominal: between $1.00 and $1.50. Finally, the court ruled a nationwide class action would be unmanageable because state laws at issue in the case vary too much to apply to plaintiffs from across the country.
The case is In re McDonald's French Fries Litigation, MDL No. 1784.
Full post as published by Food Liability Law Blog on May 08, 2009 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
McDonald's
Hit with Hepatitis Class Action
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
$189 Million Settlement Reached in Slab Litigation
Breakthrough Settlement Reached In Chinese Drywall Litigation
Chinese Drywall Litigation Breakthrough Settlement Reached
Wendy's International Inc.
allegedly fired illegal immigrant employees after missing a deadline to obtain legal status.

LexBlog Network Law Roundup - 5/8/09
Judge to Consider Class Status for Trailer Claims
Rule 23 class action status denied to hurricane victims
Federal judge refuses to certify meal, rest period class action against McDonalds
Judge Goodwin denies class certification in DuPont case
Plaintiffs Seek Class Action in Gas Leak Case







