Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> JURIST - The Paper Chase
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: JURIST - The Paper ChaseBybee declines Senate committee request to testify on interrogation memos
By Bernard Hibbitts (editor) and University of Pittsburgh School of Law students.
ADVERTISEMENTS
[JURIST] Former head of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) and federal judge Jay Bybee, who signed off on memos detailing the legal rationale for enhanced interrogation techniques, has declined an invitation to testify before the US Senate Judiciary Committee, committee chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) said Wednesday. Leahy made the announcement during a hearing before the Senate Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts on whether Bush administration interrogation techniques constituted torture. Leahy offered no explanation why Bybee chose not to testify, but said:Since Judge Bybee, through his lawyers, has declined to testify before the Committee at this time about his role in the drafting and authorization of memoranda from the Office of Legal Counsel that permitted torture, I can only presume that he has no exonerating information to provide. Judge Bybee must know that the presumption in our civil law is that when a person fails to come forward with information in his possession that is relevant to a matter, it is presumed to be because the information is negative and not helpful to his cause.
Testifying voluntary before the Judiciary Committee about these now-public memoranda is one way in which Judge Bybee could have helped complete the record of what happened and why but he refused. This is especially inappropriate given that Judge Bybee has hardly maintained silence about these matters. He has talked to friends and employees, he has communicated to the press and he has communicated through his lawyers to the Justice Department regarding the Office of Professional Responsibility's review of his actions while a government employee in the Office of Legal Counsel. Apparently the only people he will not explain his actions to are the people who granted him a lifetime appointment to the Federal bench -- the American people through their elected representatives in Congress.As former head of the OLC, Bybee signed off on a recently released memo authorizing the use of enhanced interrogation techniques. Leahy called for Bybee's resignation from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit after the memo was released. Bybee also signed off on a previously released controversial memo that defined torture as physical pain equivalent in "intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily functions, or even death."Full post as published by JURIST - The Paper Chase on May 14, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007
Strengthens examination requirements of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

"Judge Who Signed Interrogation Memos Invited to Testify"
Bybee Invited to Testify by Leahy
"US judge declines to give interrogation testimony"
Attorneys Weigh in on Bybee’s Torture Memos
US Judge Bybee Declines to Give Interrogation Testimony
Judge Bybee Breaks Silence, Defends Signing Interrogation Memos








