Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Prawfs
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: PrawfsHow Much? How Frequently?
By Dan Markel, Ethan Leib, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Paul Horwitz , Steve Vladeck, and Orly Lobel
Tying in to Rose's post from earlier today I'd like to raise a related but slightly different question about summer scholarship, and scholarship more generally: how much and how frequently? Early in my scholarly career I had a pretty fixed, even robotic, writing schedule: one article per year. It was a simple schedule, and I grew comfortable with it. As I've matured more things have gotten in the way of that simple schedule-- usually, although not always, in the direction of writing more. I'm on a couple of casebooks and occasionally get opportunities for shorter pieces of writing or solicited articles. Layered on top of what is an ingrained habit these other commitments have the effect of creating more (rather than simply different) writing opportunities and obligations. Developing a scholarly agenda and getting tenure has also led me to write more for the sake of the scholarship itself -- a positive development, of course.
But all this writing and all these plans lead me to wonder how much one ought to write, and how quickly. I assume there's an easy response (not "easy" in the pejorative sense): write as much and as quickly as you can consistent with doing quality work and without neglecting your other professional and personal obligations. Fair enough. But that sensible advice (reminiscent of Joe Jackson's "It's Different for Girls" lyrics) doesn't answer the hard questions: if you're writing a long article over the summer to submit in the late July submission season, should you also write the short essay you've been thinking about? The article instead of the finishing the book? Or spend the time on more research/polishing of the big piece? If the answer is "write the small piece if the big piece is written to your satisfaction," then how does one make that evaluation? Everything I've written would have been better if I had spent more time on that, and I assume I'm not alone in saying that.
I ask these questions not in search of the answer, which presumably doesn't exist. But any wisdom, short of an answer, would sure be appreciated.
Full post as published by Prawfs on May 18, 2009 (boomark / email).

Swine flu pandemic and law departments
Ledbetter Speaks at the Democratic National Convention
Freedom of Expression at Risk by Council of Europe
Most Frequently Asked Questions: Economic Stimulus Payments
Home Alone | Is your child ready for this







