Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: New York Public Personnel LawSelected from iNews Related to Equal Employment Opportunity
Selected from iNews Related to Equal Employment Opportunity, © 2009 John D. Sargent, All Rights Reserved, Thursday, May 21, 2009 - EEO/iNews is a free publication of EEO Services by John D. ?Jack? Sargent. Mr. Sargent retired as a Supervisory Trial Attorney from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in 2004. Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. Sargent at eeoinews@yahoo.com.
U.S. Supreme Court
Public Citizen?s most recent Sup Ct Watch list here
SCOTUSblog?s most recent Petitions to Watch here
Ross Runkel?s US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases ? Pending & decided here
Decided
Crawford v. Metro Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County, No. 06-1595 - Title VII/retaliation: (From SCOTUSwiki): The Court unanimously concluded that the ordinary meaning of ?oppose? includes giving a ?disapproving account? of unlawful behavior, even if the employee takes no further action on her own to seek to stop or remedy the conduct. Accepting the rule set forth in the EEOC?s Compliance Manual, the Court concluded that ?When an employee communicates to her employer a belief that the employer has engaged in . . . a form of employment discrimination, that communication virtually always constitutes the employee?s opposition to the activity.? The Court held open the possibility of ?eccentric cases? in which the employee makes clear his approval of the conduct in conveying the information (for example, describing a racist joke as hilarious probably wouldn?t count as opposing the joke-telling).
January 26, 2009 decision here
SCOTUS docket here
SCOTUSwiki here
14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett, No. 07-581- Enforceability of collectively bargained arbitration clause - (From SCOTUSwiki): Justice Thomas?s majority opinion held that nothing in either the National Labor Relations Act, which controls collective bargaining agreements made on behalf of union members, or the ADEA forbids unions from mandating arbitration to resolve statutory discrimination claims. The majority touted the importance of allowing parties to bargain contractually for exchanges of rights and responsibilities, and it noted that courts should generally not interfere in this process. According to the majority, ?[t]he decision to fashion a [collective bargaining agreement] to require arbitration of employment-discrimination claims is no different from the many other decisions made by parties in designing grievance machinery.?
o April 1, 2009 decision here
o SCOTUS docket here
o SCOTUSwiki here
o Noted here: George Lenard
AT&T v. Hulteen, No. 07-543 - Title VII/Denial of pre-?79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pension - (From the decision syllabus): An employer does not necessarily violate the PDA when it pays pension benefits calculated in part under an accrual rule, applied only pre-PDA, that gave less retirement credit for pregnancy than for medical leave generally. Because AT&T?s pension payments accord with a bona fide seniority system?s terms, they are insulated from challenge under Title VII §703(h).
o May 18, 2009 decision here
o SCOTUS docket here
o SCOTUSwiki here
o Noted here: Reuters; Connecticut Employment Law Blog; Yahoo; WAPO; Christian Science Monitor; Bloomberg; Shaw Valenza; NYTimes; FYI: Central Ohio Employment Law Update; Ross Runkel; Paul Mollica; SCOTUSblog (opinion recap); Fisher & Phillips; Jackson Lewis; California Labor & Employment Law Blog; Constangy, Brooks & Smith; Townhall; Workplace Prof Blog; NYTimes (Opinion); Huffington Post; Ford & Harrison; Today?s Workplace
Argued - Awaiting Decision
Gross v. FBL Fin. Servs, No. 08-441- ADEA/Must a plaintiff present direct evidence of discrimination in order to obtain a mixed-motive instruction in a non-Title VII discrimination case?
o March 31, 2009 Argument Transcript here
o SCOTUS docket here
o SCOTUSwiki here
Ricci v. Destefano, No. 07-1428 and 08-328 - Title VII/Whether municipalities may decline to certify results of an exam that would make disproportionately more white applicants eligible for promotion than minority applicants, due to fears that certifying the results would lead to charges of racial discrimination
o April 22, 2009 Argument Transcript here
o SCOTUS docket here
o SCOTUSwiki here
o Cornell Law School/LII herent>
o Noted here: Connecticut Employment Law Blog
Selected Cases Pending Cert:
Oakley v. City of Memphis, No. 08-744 - T VII
See issue description at Public Citizen:
o SCOTUS docket here
Baxter Healthcare Corp v. White., No. 08-960* -TVII /span>
See issue description at Public Citizen
o SCOTUS docket here
o *Petition denied May 18, 2009
McKnight v. Gen. Motors Corp., No. 08-1113 - ADA
See issue description at Public Citizen
o SCOTUS docket here
Adam v. Salazar, No. 08-1097 - ADEA
See issue description at Public Citizen
o SCOTUS docket here
Lewis, et al. v. City of Chicago, No. 08-974 ? T VII
See issue description (+briefs links) at SCOTUSblog
o SCOTUS docket here
o Noted here: SCOTUSblog (w/ brief links and noting that the Court has invited the views of the SG)
2nd Circuit
Duffett v. LaHood, No. 07-1831 (2d Cir. May 15, 2009)(Unpub) - Affirming dismissal of air traffic controller?s ADA regarded-as/assignment claims
New York items
DECIDED
Out-of-State Employee May Sue NY Employer for Discrimination Under State and City Human Rights Laws
FILED
[5-14] Gender/Retal: Justin Timberlake?s restaurant Southern Hospitality sued by fem ex-ee
Fired Black fem Black Equity Alliance CEO says she was canned for backing ?White and Jewish? Mike Bloomberg
EEOC Charge: Citigroup?s layoff of fems = recessionary bias
NEWS
Gender: More on 4 fems? suit vs Ulster Cnty Jail
Retaliation: Fem Utica cop says reprimand is retaliation for earlier gender/promotion-denial complaint; more here
Sex Harass: Schenectady City SD expects to be sued by fem office assistant for sex harass by male ex-facilities director
SETTLED
Delphi pays $80K to settle EEOC suit for employee who was fired.
Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on May 23, 2009 (boomark / email).
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
Football-Related Dementia and Workers' Compensation
Football-Related Dementia Is the NFL Liable?
New York Employment Law
alleged violations of New York employment law.
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
NCAA Sued for Conspiracy and Anti-competitive Practices Related to Athletic Scholarships
NCAA Sued for Conspiracy and Anti-competitive Practices Related to Athletic Scholarships
Raptiva
3 Patients Dead from Therapy-Related PML
Asarco
To Pay $2.4 Billion to Settle Asbestos-Related Claims

Sargent's EEO/iNews Newsletter
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Sees Rise in Workplace Discrimination Cases
Online Resources: EEOC Laws, Regulations and Policy Guidance
Sharp Increase in Employment Discrimination Cases
Online Resource for Employment Law: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Brief Bank Index








