ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Vacating an arbitration award

ADVERTISEMENTS
Vacating an arbitration award
Matter of Board of Educ. of Amityville Union Free School Dist. v Amityville Teacher's Assn., 2009 NY Slip Op 04230, Decided on May 26, 2009, Appellate Division, Second Department

Complaining that the arbitrator's award was ?indefinite and nonfinal? when it directed that ?sixth grade teachers assigned a sixth teaching period? shall be paid at the "negotiated sixth period rate" of pay, the Board of Education asked the court to vacate the award.

The Appellate Division agreed that this portion of the arbitration award ?does not clearly define the applicable rate of pay under the award, thus creating a new controversy between the parties with respect thereto.?

The court vacated that portion of the award and remanded the matter to the arbitrator ?for a hearing and for a determination solely of that issue? ? i.e., the amount of the compensation to be paid a teacher assigned to teach a sixth teaching period.

Citing Meisels v Uhr, 79 NY2d 526, 536the Appellate Division ruled that an award is subject to vacatur as indefinite or nonfinal "only if it leaves the parties unable to determine their rights and obligations, if it does not resolve the controversy submitted, or if it creates a new controversy."

In contrast, the Appellate Division said that ?An award is final and definite if the computation of the award is so clear and specific that the determination of the amounts owing is merely an accounting calculation.?

In this instance, said the court, the provision in the award challenged by the school district ?does not clearly define the applicable rate of pay under the award, thus creating a new controversy between the parties? as to the proper amount of compensation due the educator assigned to teach a sixth teaching period.

The decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2009/2009_04230.htm

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on June 01, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0119 secs (new cache)