Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation BlogCourt Grants Motion to Compel Director Emails After Company Fails to Preserve or Collect That Information
By Francis G. X. Pileggi, Esq.
Grace Brothers, Ltd. v. Siena Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 184-CC (Del. Ch., June 2, 2009), read letter decision here.
Kevin Brady, a highly respected Delaware litigator, provides us with the benefit of his following review of this letter decision.
On June 2, 2009, Chancellor Chandler in granted plaintiff's motion to compel emails among defendants directors on an expedited basis. This action was filed in January 2004 by Grace Brothers challenging a reverse stock split by Siena as a violation of 8 Del. C. § 155. Grace Brothers asked Sienna to produce emails among members of Siena's board of directors and Sienna not only refused to produce the emails, it said that 'there was no need for the board of directors to search for the emails.' Sienna not only failed to identify or locate this information, it failed to preserve this information and it failed to meet its burden of showing that Grace's document requests were improper or 'unreasonably cumulative or duplicative.'
Siena argued that it didn't have to collect and produce the directors' email because the company had already produced the relevant emails when they produced the sender-side versions. Additionally, Siena argued that 'its process of asking the directors about their document retention and email communication practices was sufficiently reasonable to determine if the directors had unique copies of any emails already produced from other sources. It concluded that the directors did not have any unique copies.'
The Court disagreed with Siena's position and found that this request would not: (i) be overly burdensome; (ii) result in great expense for Siena; (iii) be duplicative; and (iv) harass Siena. The Court granted the motion to compel this production in an expedited fashion given the impending June 15 trial date.
Full post as published by Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog on June 03, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Limited Liability Company Formation
Relevant information for starting a limited liability company in California
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Stock Splits and Reverse Stock Splits
How splits can affect stock value
Sex Offender Lists
Registries by State and County
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Investor Fraud
Company president and director Gregory William Rivers to pay $10,000 shareholder fraud settlement.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Storm8 Faces Class Action over Personal Information Harvesting through iPhone Games
Storm8 Faces Class Action of Personal Information Harvesting through iPhone Games
Zonisamide
FDA Issues Information on Risk for Metabolic Acidosis
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

Court Grants Motion To Compel Exact Copy of CD for Review at Counsel's Office
Motion for FRCP 35 Mental Examination and Motion to Compel Production of Records Denied
Motion to Compel Defense Counsel to Wear Appropriate Shoes at Trial
Court Orders White House to Provide Additional Information About Backup Media Being Preserved
Fourth DCA Holds A Stay is NOT Required While A Motion to Compel Arbitration is on Appeal
"Blatant disregard" of the local rules of meeting and conferring
Oregon Media Shield Law (and Bloggers) Case Documents








