Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Public Defense Blogs -> Fifth Circuit Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Public Defense
: Fifth Circuit BlogRemorse Not Requried for Acceptance of Responsibility, But Lack of Remorse a Valid Basis for Upward Variance
ADVERTISEMENTS
United States v. Douglas, No. 07-11007 (5th Cir. May 29, 2009) (O'Connor,* Wiener, Stewart)Can a defendant receive an acceptance-of-responsibility adjustment under guideline §3E1.1, even if he is not remorseful for having committed the offense? Yes. That's the good news in Douglas. The bad? A district court may impose an above-Guidelines sentence based on that lack of remorse.Our facts:ChuckFull post as published by Fifth Circuit Blog on June 05, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
FAA
Signficant Lack of Oversight in Airline Maintenance
Auto Financing
Credit Acceptance Corp. agrees to $52.1 million class action settlement after overcharging consumers for fees and interest on automobile installment contracts.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

On Appeal, One-Time Fugitive Fights Prison Term
Upward Variance Presumed Reasonable
Upward Variance in Child Porn Case Affirmed
No remorse for killing, witness says









