ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Legal Ethics ForumRoberts's 40 Questions
ADVERTISEMENTS
I liked the Caperton result, and am hopeful that Steve Lubet, Andy Perlman, Alex Long, and others are correct that it will not spawn counter-productive collateral litigation.
I wanted to comment on Roberts's 40 questions, which have provoked much commentary. If I understand Steve and Andy correctly, they dismiss Roberts's concerns by arguing that the recent Heller decision, like most landmark SCOTUS decisions, leaves numerous unanswered questions. But my understanding of Roberts's point is that his unsettled questions go to the legitimacy of adjudication itself, and that they potentially apply to the majority of cases in states where judges run for office. On that basis, reasonable people could draw a distinction between Caperton and Heller, even if they liked Caperton's result. If so, the proper response to Roberts isn't that all major decisions produce unanswered questions and unsettling results but rather that he's made a bad prediction about Caperton's effects. Which brings me back to the predictions of Steve, Andy, and Alex.
Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on June 09, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Income Tax Changes for 2007
Get Answers to your Income Tax Questions
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

"Justice Roberts's Portfolio: Why stock investments and Supreme Court service don't mix."
Jeffrey Toobin has at Chief Justice John Roberts.
nailing Jell-O to the wall . . . literally
Russ Roberts, The Price of Everything:
Roberts's GINA Article to Vandy
Interesting Comment On Pennsylvania v. Dunlap:
first colorful (or is it "noir") dissent of the new term








