ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Structured Settlements 4Real

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: Structured Settlements 4Real

We Don't Need The "Huzpah"-Lah

By John Darer

ADVERTISEMENTS

As if it was enough to take on the responsibility critiquing structured settlement websites for the improper use of the English language for the first time I have an issue over the Settlement Channel's use of Yiddish.

In today's rant concerning one firm's commission sharing agreement Mark Wahlstrom uses the word "Huzpah". There is no such word in Yiddish. I believe the word Mark meant is "Chutzpah" (pronounced with the phlegmatic "ch" as in the Scottish, Loch Ness or "Achmed the Dead Terrorist".), or Hutzpah, not Huzpah (which is too close to the word for "the white canopy" under which the groom "steps on the glass").  Incidentally the modern use of the word "chutzpah" can be used to express strong disapproval as Mark has,  or a  grudging admiration, which he has not.

Further to the subject of Mark's rant. I believe I have seen the precise commission sharing agreement that Mark describes. It is being circulated by members of a large national agency and has been for some time.  I disagree with Mark that the "kitchen sink agreement" is a sign of desperation. I see it is a sign of cheeky yet amusing opportunism. As opportunistic as it may seem, it's hardly worth anyone getting apoplectic over (and I'm not saying Mark is). I just can't imagine any settlement planner ever agreeing to the first offering and it isn't being pushed hard anyway.

It is worth noting that I learned today that the same national company (of whose representative I am assuming Mark refers) apparently sent guidelines (to its members) for splitting commissions , on a mutually favorable basis with brokers or settlement planners engaged by the plaintiff.

I continue to be troubled however (in view of Principle VI of the NSSTA Code of Ethics), that any member of any NSSTA member firm is soliciting business or participating in a transaction without being insurance licensed in the state, or seeking a share of commissions on variable or securities products without being appropriately licensed etc. I encourage Mark Wahlstrom to report such behavior in writing, along with the evidence to the NSSTA Board of Directors. It is not enough that NSSTA members (and non members) gripe to each other about ethics. Do something about it!

Full post as published by Structured Settlements 4Real on June 17, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 11/04/26 00:24:33)