ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

NLRB?s ruling that terminating non-union employees for having picketed its health clinic was lawful overturned

ADVERTISEMENTS
NLRB?s ruling that terminating non-union employees for having picketed its health clinic was lawful overturned
Civil Service Employees Association, Local 1000, AFSCME, v National Labor Relations Board, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Docket No. 07-5041-ag, 2008, decided June 19, 2009

CSEA represented correctional officers at the Albany County Correctional Facility in Albany and sought to organize and represent employees working at a health clinic located in the Albany correctional facility operated by Correctional Medical Services, Inc.

CSEA filed a petition seeking judicial review of an NRLB decision and order that ruled that an employer?s termination of non-union employees for having picketed a health clinic for the purpose of seeking recognition of a union as a collective bargaining agent without providing 10-days prior notice was lawful.

The Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed with the NLRB's ruling, concluding that the termination under the circumstances was not lawful. The court explained that as such picketing is a right of an employee recognized in 29 U.S.C. §157 and that §158(g), on its face, does not apply to employees in their individual capacities.

The court decided that in view of the distinctions Congress made in §158(d) between striking and picketing, Congress intended to protect an employee from such types of discipline that might result from their participation in such picketing and also intended to protect an employee from discipline due to such participation without the notice a labor organization would otherwise be required to provide pursuant to §158(g).

The decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c32c50c4-72df-4761-a790-3f76d5c3f812/4/doc/07-5041-ag_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/c32c50c4-72df-4761-a790-3f76d5c3f812/4/hilite/

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on June 23, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0147 secs (new cache)