ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Ethics

: Legal Ethics Forum

Edward Sherman on attorneys fees in aggregate litigation

ADVERTISEMENTS

Paper here.  From the abstract of the new article from Edward Sherman of Tulane:



The American legal system has much stronger procedural devices for aggregating like cases -- such as consolidation and class actions -- than do other countries. Other countries have eyed the American approach to "aggregate litigation" with both interest and suspicion. There is recognition that the traditional single-party model of adjudication is not well-suited to situations today when the claims of many individuals arise from the same basic conduct of a defendant, whether it involve defective products, environmental hazards, or wrongful business conduct. But other countries have been troubled by what they consider to be the excesses of American class actions and "entrepreneurial litigation." Nevertheless experimentation with aggregate procedures has quickened in other countries, and the U.S. is no longer alone in allowing class, representative, or group litigation, or in consolidating similar litigation.



Aggregate litigation invariably impacts the individual attorney-client relationship. What was understood as to the attorney's responsibilities may be altered as aggregate committees of attorney consortia assume principal roles in the litigation. Nevertheless, in consolidated cases the individual attorney-client relationship remains, with attorneys continuing to perform services on behalf of their individual clients. Conflicts as to fees between attorneys who have fulfilled different functions have arisen, and courts are having to determine how much supervisory authority they can and should exercise. The experience of the Vioxx consolidated multi-district litigation case, with its unique global settlement extending across jurisdictional lines and its order capping contingent fees at 32%, provides a crucible for testing the parameters of judicial supervision in aggregate litigation. The growing experience of American courts in dealing with these issues should be of interest to other countries as they move towards greater aggregate litigation.

Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on June 23, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0027 secs (from cache 11/06/26 11:26:04)