Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Misleading Advertising Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Misleading Advertising LawAdvanced Money Management Ponzi
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a Chula Vista, California resident and two entities he controls for operating a Ponzi-like scheme through five hedge funds.
The SEC alleges that Moises Pacheco, Advanced Money Management, Inc. (AMM), and Business Development & Consulting Co. (BD&C) raised $14.7 million from more than 200 investors over a 3½-year period, acting as investment advisers to the five self-described hedge funds -- AP Premium Value Funds I through IV and Capital Partnership Group. According to the SEC's complaint, Pacheco told investors that he had developed a lucrative investment strategy involving the purchase and sale of covered call options, and that the hedge funds exclusively relied upon this strategy to generate trading profits ranging from 30 percent to 48 percent per year.
In reality, Pacheco did not generate the returns he claimed to have made, and instead used investor principal to pay purported returns until the scheme collapsed.
According to the SEC's complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, the hedge funds generated trading profits of only about $367,000, but paid investors purported returns of more than $9.7 million.
The SEC alleges that the defendants thus operated a Ponzi-like scheme and further misused investor principal by transferring their money to Pacheco, entities under his control, or numerous third parties for reasons having nothing to do with the purported trading.
The SEC alleges that Pacheco claimed that the hedge funds had generated returns ranging from 2.5 to 4 percent per month during their existence, and continued to claim that they generated returns in that range until January 2008, when he reduced the returns to 1.25 percent per month.
Pacheco told fund investors that the reduction was due to deteriorating economic conditions.
Most fund investors live in the Chula Vista, California area, and know either Pacheco, one of his friends or family members, or another investor. The SEC alleges that Pacheco made no effort to determine whether the hedge fund investors were accredited or sophisticated, and did not provide investors with financial statements.
Neither Pacheco nor his entities have ever been registered with the SEC.
Full post as published by Misleading Advertising Law on June 24, 2009 (boomark / email).
Wesley A. Snyder et al.
alleging the consultants perpetrated a Ponzi scheme by encouraging borrowers to lend more than they needed.
Money Mart Canada
Settles Class Action for $100 Million
Treasurer Embezzlement
Mary Lou Puccio repays Warren Cheer and Pom Program $26,000 after stealing money.
Bankrupt Money Manager
Former officers to pay $10.7 million settlement in fraud lawsuit.
Transit Technicians Scam
Two Municipal Transportation Agency agree to pay $287,000 settlement for stealing money from fare boxes.
Petroleum Mishaps
BP settles $9.75 million mis-management suit.

Does Bernie Madoff Have Victims or Accomplices
Trade Secret Jury Verdict : Innovative Technologies Corp. v. James Silcott et al.
Deadline for Certain Taxpayers With Madoff/Other Ponzi Scheme Losses
Nursing Home Firm Charged with $300 Million Fraud
Spotting a Ponzi scheme or investment scam

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=dc769f10-583f-4fba-81f1-5f9ea6ca3e06)







