Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Defense Newsletter Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Defense Newsletter BlogFlores: Sur-13 gang convictions and sentences affirmed
By Tim Cone
ADVERTISEMENTS
In U.S. v. Flores, No. 08-10775 (June 29, 2009), the Court affirmed the convictions and sentences of defendants convicted of RICO and murder crimes as members of the Sur-13 gang.The Court found no fault in the district court?s excusing a potential juror for cause when she said she suffered from attention deficit disorder ("ADD"), noting that untreated ADD could interfere with a juror?s ability to pay attention in a lengthy trial.The Court also rejected an argument that the venire was prejudiced by a potential juror?s comment that, as a corrections officer, he had dealt with some of the defendants on trial. The "short and nondescript" statements did not create a continuing influence on the trial.The Court rejected the argument that a statement by a gang member describing the details of a murder was not made in "furtherance" of a conspiracy, and was therefore not admissible under F...continue to full postFull post as published by Defense Newsletter Blog on June 30, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Court Affirms Kozlowski & Swartz Convictions
Database of the day: Albuquerque Gang Registry
New Evidence of David Flores' Innocence
Co-Defendants' Drug Conspiracy Convictions Affirmed
Opinion Recap: Flores-Figueroa v. US








