Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> AFL-CIO NOW BLOG
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: AFL-CIO NOW BLOGSEC Proposals Would Expose Conflicts on CEO Pay
By James Parks
![]() |
|
The AFL-CIO today applauded rules proposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to give shareholders better information about the potential conflicts of interest of compensation consultants who help set pay for senior corporate executives.
A December 2007 congressional report found that CEOs of companies that use compensation consultants who have potential conflicts, such as providing management with other services, received considerably higher pay than CEOs of companies that used independent compensation consultants.
In a statement, AFL-CIO President John Sweeney said “better disclosure is needed to bring these conflicts of interest out of the shadows.”
Outsized compensation packages for senior executives hurt shareholders, including pension plans investing the retirement savings of America’s working families. Labor union members participate in pension plans with more than $4 trillion in assets. Union-sponsored pension plans hold about $450 billion in assets. Excessive pay packages for top executives are a giveaway of our members’ money.
The proposed rules, developed under the leadership of SEC Chairwoman Mary Shapiro, will be open for comment for as long as 60 days.
CEOs of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies were paid an average of $10.4 million in 2008. To learn more about excessive executive pay, visit our Executive PayWatch website.
Sweeney also voiced support for the SEC’s decision to require companies to disclose information about directors’ skills and experience on issues ranging from pay to accounting, so shareholders can make better choices among nominees for company boards of directors.
The SEC also has moved to eliminate broker discretionary voting for directors when shareholders fail to give them directions on how to vote. Sweeney said the AFL-CIO is “heartened” by the decision.
This rule is long overdue and will ensure that votes for shareholder proposals are not unfairly skewed in favor of management.
Finally, we are pleased that the SEC is proposing giving shareholders an advisory vote on the pay of senior executives of companies that received taxpayer assistance, as required by the law.
Read Sweeney’s statement here.
Full post as published by AFL-CIO NOW BLOG on July 01, 2009 (boomark / email).
Stock Market Losses
alleging bad financial advice and conflicts of interest.

A Big Week for Conflicts of Interest
Does disclosure solve the conflicts problem
No wonder CIRM wants to emulate the NIH: "conflicts of interest"!
ccMixter to the max Q&A; proposals due July 29
send in your LWI conference proposals
2010 Legal Writing Institute Conference - Remember to Submit Proposals by June 15!










