ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Food Liability Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Food Liability Law Blog

Another Recall From a Company That Does the Right Thing

By Kenneth Odza

ADVERTISEMENTS

The FDA announced a recall of fresh tuna steaks distributed to Shaw's, Star Market and Big Y grocery stores by North Coast Sea-Foods Corp. of Boston and New Bedford.  The alleged problem was increased levels of histamine that might cause scombroid poisoning.  The tuna was removed from sale on June 24, but consumers who might have frozen the steaks were told to return them to the stores for a full refund.  We again assume that North Coast (and its insurers) will be funding the refunds.

What made me write about this recall was a rather silly poll in DailyKos.  The question was whether the increase in recalls was due to the food supply becoming less safe or that the FDA was getting better.  Like many online polls, this so oversimplified the situation that I thought I should write about it, and the North Coast tuna recall seemed as good a vehicle as any.

The three reported cases of scombroid poisoning associated with this tuna would presumably have been reported to local public health officials in New England, not the FDA.  Or they might have been reported to the markets, which in turn would have easily been able to identify the source of the tuna and reported to North Coast (scombroid poisoning occurs almost immediately, so there isn't the usual problem of figuring out what food might have caused a delayed reaction).  Both the markets and North Coast will have significant food safety programs.  Some of this will be the result of government action, and some of it the result of simply caring about their customers.  There is no indication that this outbreak was the result of anyone's inattention or failure. 

It took me awhile to identify that I had the right North Coast Sea-Foods Corp., because their name is spelled differently in the release.  In doing my research, I discovered some nice things about them, such as that they had argued strenuously against a Department of Defense initiative to buy cheaper, and potentially more hazardous fish for our troops, on the grounds of food safety.  Another thing I learned was that they had installed solar power at their Boston facility, and considered wind power at their New Bedford facility.  We at Stoel are not just committed to renewable energy, we literally wrote the book on it.  So, similar to the Fat Duck and Nestle, even those committed to doing the right thing can sometimes be the subject of a food recall. 

Full post as published by Food Liability Law Blog on July 03, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0193 secs (new cache)