ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Class Action

: CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005

A Quantum of Solace for CAFA

ADVERTISEMENTS

Grimmelmann v. Pulte Home Corp., et al, No. 08-1878 (D. Az. May 1, 2009)

In James Bond's latest outing the poor residents of Bolivia turned to 007 to save the day when a mad man threatened to steal their water supply and sell it back to them at a substantial mark up. Why you might ask would a British super spy waste his time worrying about the price of water in Bolivia?

The District Court for the District of Arizona, had a similar concern when the plaintiff home owners in this case turned to it to save the day when the defendant, home builder, attempted to sell the local water system back to the home owners through higher rates. The home owners called on 00-CAFA for help since it had already paid for the water system once in the purchase price of their homes.

Bond probably wouldn't have wasted his time helping out the thirsty Bolivians if the bad guy wasn't already responsible for killing his girlfriend in the last movie. Similarly, the District Court decided that under § 1332(d)(4)(A) it wouldn't be wasting its time on this case either if the defendant wasn't already before it in a similar case.

Before finally agreeing to let 00-CAFA save the day, the court had to satisfy itself that this band of water thieves were part of an international ring of villains and not just local hired guns. The court found that because the 'primary defendants', those with direct liability, were not residents of Arizona, § 1332(d)(4)(B) did not apply and it was permitted to take jurisdiction in the case.

Satisfied that it had jurisdiction, the court moved on to hear other motions in the case. But have no fear: CAFA Will Return

By:  Gregory LaBorde

Full post as published by CAFA Law Blog - Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 on July 13, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0134 secs (new cache)