Labor & Employment Law

DC Court of Appeals agrees and disagrees with SEC on Equity Index Annuities

By Dobin & Jenks

As prior readers of The Law Planet Blog know, I have a strong dislike for Equity Index Annuities. I think they are lousy products and, to the extent they are sold, should be sold by someone who has proven at least a modicum of securities knowledge. Insurance salesman, without a Series 6 or 7 license, have not proven this knowledge. Yet they were allowed to sell complicated, market-based products.

I cheered last year when the SEC announced Rule 151A which would bring these products under their purview. It would also require licensing of salespeople and registration with a broker-dealer. All of these are good things. The Insurance and Annuity industry did not agree with me. It was nothing personal, I?m sure.

The industry took their case to court, in the case American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company v. Securities and Exchange Commission (July 21, 2009-6) on Petitions to argue that the Rule should not be enforced. The industry won, and lost.

There should be no joy in Mudville here. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals has told the SEC what it did wrong and what it needs to do right. On the other hand, the Court told the insurance industry that these products can be regulated as securities. For me, that?s the important part.

The court wrote ?In this case, the SEC has adopted an interpretation that is based in reason. By their nature, FIAs ?appeal to the purchaser not on the usual insurance basis of stability and security but on the prospect of ?growth? through sound investment management.?? This is what I?ve been saying all along. This is a market-based product. It is a security. It should be sold by qualified securities salespeople. Now it?s up to the SEC to make the requisite findings regarding its rulemaking and give it another try.

Stay tuned?

Full post as published by The Law Planet Blog on July 22, 2009 (boomark / email).