Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Seattle Trademark Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Seattle Trademark LawyerWould Smith's Owner Have Had a Claim for Trade Dress Infringement?
By Michael Atkins
It’s not going to turn into a lawsuit, but check out the photos below of Seattle’s Smith bar and Starbucks’ adjacent 15th Street Coffee & Tea, which opened on Friday. Smith owner Linda Derschang initially cried foul about Starbucks’ design, saying it copied the look-and-feel of her neighborhood pub. However, she changed her mind, saying the differences in the parties’ offerings would help avoid harm.
Outside, both establishments have the same brownish-grey exterior color and similar (but differently colored) awnings. Inside, both have a lot of exposed wood (including bars, tables, and chairs) and share a rustic feel. Both have hanging lamps, exposed wood beams, exposed electrical work, and exposed duct work. Perhaps most notably, both have display signs consisting of chalkboards framed in reclaimed wood and large wood-framed antique paintings. Both establishments sell beer and wine. Both offer food, though Smith offers pub fare and 15th Street most prominently offers baked goods.
For the sake of discussion, would all this add up to a successful claim of trade dress infringement? Remember, to be protectable, trade dress needs to be nonfunctional (e.g., every bar has tables, chairs, a bar, and a cash register, so those features don’t count) and distinctive (either because the trade dress is “suggestive,” “arbitrary,” or “fanciful,” or because the trade dress is “descriptive” and has acquired distinctiveness through secondary meaning). And to be actionable, the later adopter’s use of similar trade dress needs to be likely to confuse consumers into believing some association exists with the senior adopter (in this case, that 15th Street has something to do with Smith, like has a common owner or that Smith’s owner approved Starbucks’ use of a similar design).
Taking all this into account, would Smith’s owner have had a valid claim?
Exteriors of Smith (left) and Starbucks’ new 15th Street Coffee & Tea
(with open door at middle right). (Photo by STL)

Interiors of Smith (top) and 15th Street Coffee & Tea. (Photos by STL)
Full post as published by Seattle Trademark Lawyer on July 27, 2009 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Anna Nicole Smith's Legal Troubles
Court cases and legal issues related to Anna Nicole Smith
Ladder Accident Injury Claims
Were you or a loved one injured in a ladder accident?
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Citigroup Smith Barney
Settle Gender Class Action for $33 Million
AIG Settles Injury Claim
for $18 Million
Failure-to-accommodate claim yields $1.82M award
$1.82 Million Awarded in Employment Lawsuit
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.
Recovery Claim
Florida Insurance Guarantee Association agrees to pay $14 million settlement to Home Solutions of America for construction services.

KNIGHTS ARMAMENT CO. v. OPTICAL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Trade mark infringement: who can provide consent
Seventh Circuit: Operating agreement permitted license of marks, so no trademark infringement
If You Hate Trademark Law, How Do You Feel About Trade Dress
Toilet Paper Trade Dress Suit Rolls On:
Apple and CBS trade mark infringement suit over Mighty Mouse
A Business Owners Guide to Trademarks: Trade Dress








