ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Seattle Trademark Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Seattle Trademark Lawyer

USDA's Organic Labeling Requirements Function as a Solid Certification Mark

By Michael Atkins

ADVERTISEMENTS

The SF Gate had a good article this weekend about the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Program. The USDA ORGANIC seal functions as a certification mark, as only producers meeting the NOP’s specifications can use it in connection with their goods. But it’s food labeling law rather than trademark law that governs its use. Indeed, I couldn’t find the seal as a registered trademark anywhere.

According to the NOP, its labeling requirements apply to “raw, fresh products and processed products that contain organic agricultural ingredients.” In summary:

  • Products labeled as “100 percent organic” must contain only organically produced ingredients and processing aids.
  • Products labeled “Organic” must consist of at least 95 percent organically produced ingredients. Any remaining product ingredients must consist of approved nonagricultural substances approved.
  • Processed products that contain at least 70 percent organic ingredients can use the phrase “made with organic ingredients.”
  • Organic production and handling operations must meet certification standards to become accredited by USDA-accredited certifying agents. Applicants must submit information about their organic system plan, including their practices and substances used in production, record keeping procedures, and practices to prevent commingling of organic and non-organic products.

Persons who knowingly sell or label as organic a product that is not produced and handled in accordance with the NOP’s regulations are subject to a civil penalty of up to $11,000.

The SF Gate article says complying with NOP standards can be difficult, but those who do think it pays off. “It’s worth it to us,” said one organic producer, even though becoming USDA certified organic increases her costs by at least 50 percent. “We’re mission driven and committed to our No. 1 value: authentic organic.”

Though other certifying organizations exist, a Seattle-based consumer researcher said the USDA’s seal is the only one that counts. “The USDA symbol is the only one that mainstream consumers can recognize. It’s the most recognizable and credible symbol that would inspire consumers to try a new product in the organic non-food space. The other ones, they’re just noise.”

These folks don’t talk about labeling compliance in terms of trademark law. But they sure speak the language.

Full post as published by Seattle Trademark Lawyer on August 05, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0133 secs (new cache)