Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogBurk & Lemley on Industry Variation & Patent Law
By Lawrence Solum
Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley (University of California, Irvine Law School and Stanford Law School) have posted Courts and the Patent System (Regulation, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 18-23, Summer 2009) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
Innovation and patent law work differently in different industries. To some degree, the courts? interpretations of patent and trademark law accommodate those differences. It is not much of an exaggeration to say that the patent system must bend or break: a patent system that is not flexible enough to account for these industry differences is unlikely to survive, let along accomplish its stated goals. We believe the system has the flexibility to do both, but this will require the courts to better recognize and use the policy levers they have been given.
Recommended.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on August 06, 2009 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Oil and Gas
industry workers allegedly subject to serious accident injury from hazardous conditions.
Water Contamination
Industry giants to pay $500,000 settlement in environmental lawsuit.
Railroad Workers
concerning the growing number of work-related injuries in the railroad industry.

Remembering URochester and the COX-2 patent litigation
Patent Hawk on Lemley, Cotropia on copying
Lemley astonished that apportionment was controversial
Lemley, Sampat: experienced examiners allow more []









