Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Defense Newsletter Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Defense Newsletter BlogKaley: Defendants entitled to hearing on seizure of assets pretrial
By Tim Cone
ADVERTISEMENTS
In U.S. v. Kaley, No. 07-13010 (Aug. 18, 2009), the Court held that the district court should have held an evidentiary hearing to determine whether to lift an injunction preventing the defendants from encumbering their home in order to raise money to pay for defense counsel. Citing U.S. v. Bissell, 866 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir. 1989), the Court held that the district court should have held a hearing to weigh the suffering of the defendants from the denial of counsel of choice against the government?s interest in recovering the assets seized.Full post as published by Defense Newsletter Blog on August 18, 2009 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.
allegedly failed to give policyholders discounted rates to which they were entitled.
Overtime, CA
California, you may be entitled to overtime wages
Overtime
You may be entitled to overtime pay.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

D.Conn.: Seizure of children in 2d Cir. does not violate parents' own rights
"Suspect's Work With Bin Laden Alleged; FBI Agent Testifies at Pretrial Hearing"
CA3: Defendant who failed to respond to officers' show of authority is not seized
Asset Seizure Utilized by Los Angeles City Council
SG recommends denial in foreign suit injunction cases








