Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Discriminations
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: DiscriminationsCivil Rights Division Reshaped And Directed To Pursue Disparate Impact Cases Aggressively
Fulfilling the wet dreams of liberals and the worst fears of conservatives, the Obama Justice Department is hiring 50 additional lawyers in the Civil Rights Division while shifting its focus to disparate impact enforcement. ?As part of this shift,? the New York Times reports,
the Obama administration is planning a major revival of high-impact civil rights enforcement against policies, in areas ranging from housing to hiring, where statistics show that minorities fare disproportionately poorly. President George W. Bush?s appointees had discouraged such tactics, preferring to focus on individual cases in which there is evidence of intentional discrimination.This shift is an effort to restructure American society by requiring racial proportionality everywhere, and hence it destroys any basis for believing that Obama would be a post-racial president, putting bitterly controversial racial politics behind us.
As I discussed here and here, Obama believes the United States is afflicted with pervasive ?structural inequality,? a disease for which aggressive ?disparate impact? enforcement leading to racial proportionality is the cure.
As I argued here, the liberal solution to ?structural inequality? is to regard ?all employment policies or practices ... that have a disparate impact as by definition discriminatory by virtue of their disparate impact alone,? and now the Civil Rights Division is gearing up to impose that solution. In July, the Times reports,
the division?s acting head, Loretta King, sent a memorandum to every federal agency urging more aggressive enforcement of regulations that forbid recipients of taxpayer money from policies that have a disparate impact on minorities.But perhaps there?s a silver lining to this otherwise ominous cloud over the principle holding that everyone has a right to be treated without regard to race: since it seems that virtually everything has ?a disparate impact on minorities,? maybe this new, perverse civil rights enforcement policy can impose some restraint on the currently unrestrained distribution of taxpayer money to just about anybody for just about anything.
Full post as published by Discriminations on September 01, 2009 (boomark / email).
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Cumulative Voting
Protecting minority shareholder interests
State Will Statutes
State Differences in Last Will and Testament Checklist
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Civil / Human Rights
alleging violations of basic human and civil rights.
Rally Rights
Gettysburg Borough awards arrested protester $22,500 civil rights settlement.
Becker County
Faces Civil Rights Class Action by Inmates and their Attorneys
Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.
Owasso, OK
$300,000 settlement reached in civil rights violations lawsuit.
Video Taping Arrest
Harris County pays wrongfully arrested brothers $1.7 million civil rights settlement.

Gastwirth and Miao on EEOC's 4/5ths rule in disparate impact cases
DOJ Civil Rights Division Sued for Discrimination
Title VII, The SCOTUS, Judicial Activism and "Disparate Impact"
Justice Department Shift Away From Religious Discrimination Focus Anticipated
Perez To Head Civil Rights Division








