Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Groklaw

Intellectual Property Law

: Groklaw

Apple Requests a Protective Order After a Psystar Email Shows Up on Charles Nesson's Blog

By Pamela Jones et al.

Apple has filed a Reply to Psystar's Supplemental Briefing and Motion to Compel -- that's on Psystar's alleged need for more financial info on Apple's profits. Or more exactly, it seeks to file one and asks the court for permission, on the basis that Psystar raised new arguments in its Supplemental Brief. And Apple has included its own cross-motion for a protective order. Apple doesn't trust Psystar to keep confidential matters from the public, and it presents evidence that Psystar's lawyer has been communicating about the case to Professor Charles Nesson of Harvard, who represented Joel Tenenbaum. One email from Psystar CEO Rudy Pedraza to Psystar lawyer K.D. Camara has ended up on Nesson's blog, for all the world to read. So much for Psystar's representation that Apple's concern about confidentiality is unnecessary.

Full post as published by Groklaw on September 03, 2009 (boomark / email).