Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Trademark Law Blogs -> Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Trademark Law
: Las Vegas Trademark AttorneyFish & Richardson Files Foreclosure Action to Let the World Know ?Who?s Your Daddy?
By Ryan Gile
In February 2005, WYD engaged F&R?s legal services (most likely in connection with a trademark infringement lawsuit filed by Who's Ya Daddy, Inc., the owner of the identical mark for clothing, against WYD in 2005 -- Who's Ya Daddy, Inc. v. Who's Your Daddy, Inc., Case No. 05-cv-00670 (S.D. Cal.).
Unfortunately (but not surprisingly given that in litigation, the only parties that win are the lawyers), WYD fell behind in paying its monthly legal services invoices. In September 2006, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement whereby F&R received a first priority security interest against WYD?s trademarks which was recorded by F&R through a UCC Financing Statement filed with the California Secretary of State on September 27, 2006.
Nonetheless, WYD was still not able to make the payments required under the terms of the Settlement Agreement. F&R sued for breach of contract in California Superior court. After the action was filed, F&R recorded its Security Agreement against WYD?s thirteen trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (?PTO?).
F&R eventually was granted summary judgment in its state court breach of contract action and the court awarded F&R $348,651.18 [ed. ? litigation is expensive]. F&R now seeks to foreclose on WYD?s trademarks against which F&R recorded its security agreement by obtaining a court order directing the PTO to certify that F&R is the owner of WYD?s trademark registrations.
With the economy hurting the revenue streams of so many law firms, perhaps F&R is looking to expand into the energy drink market by claiming ownership of WYD?s trademark registrations (and purpotedly the associated goodwill that goes along with those marks). I can?t wait to try a Who's Your Daddy energy drink where Fish & Richardson is responsible for maintaining the quality control of the goods. Of course, an outright sale of the marks to an existing energy drink maker is the more likely outcome if F&R successfully obtains ownership of the registrations, but it?s an interesting image ? law firm licensing its marks and overseeing the quality control of the goods. This could also just be F&R's efforts to force WYD to pay off the judgment under threat of losing its trademark registrations.
Even more interesting is that even if F&R obtains the trademark registrations, are they really obtaining the underlying goodwill associated with the marks if F&R cannot also obtain and sell WYD?s particular energy drink recipes? If F&R resells the marks to another energy drink maker who then slaps those names on their own energy drink beverages, isn?t this misleading to consumers who are likely to believe the source of the goods and services is the same source that they have always known and associated with Who's Your Daddy brand energy drinks?
Full post as published by Las Vegas Trademark Attorney on September 15, 2009 (boomark / email).
How to Stop Home Foreclosure
Bankruptcy can Stop Foreclosure
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
GMAC Faces Class Action over Foreclosure Abuses
GMAC Faces Foreclosure Abuses Class Action
Bank of America Faces Class Action over Mortgage Foreclosure Practices
Bank of America Faces Class Action over Mortgage Foreclosure Practices
Class Action Filed Against Banks in Foreclosure Proceedings
Class Action Filed Against Banks in Foreclosure Proceedings
Lehman Brothers
Bankrupt, Files Chapter 11
Nevada Onion
Workers Injured, EPA Files Complaint
Atlantis Smoked Fish Dip
Recalled due to Possible Listeria Contamination

Foreclosure Sale Called Off As KC Homeowner Files Suit Alleging Fraud In Lending Process
Fish & Richardson Wins ITC Ruling in Phison Patent Case
Fish & Richardson Catches Error in Patent Office's PTA Calculation
San Diego ACC Schedules Brown Bag Trademark Discussion (July 9)
Two Fish & Richardson patent litigators join Mintz Levin
In re Ferguson: Patentable Subject Matter









