ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Breaching test security

ADVERTISEMENTS
Breaching test security
Settlement of disciplinary charges

The School District filed disciplinary charges against a fifth grade teacher alleging that she had allowed students to correct their incorrect answers in a district-wide mathematics proficiency test, thereby compromising the test?s validity.

The disciplinary action was settled prior to holding a Section 3020-a disciplinary hearing when the teacher agreed to:

1. Acknowledge that she had ?inappropriately assisted students? in the examination;

2. Pay a fine of one month?s salary, $5,800; and

3. Accept reassignment as a sixth-grade ?resource teacher.?

Penalties vary in such cases.

In an earlier case filed under the ?old? Section 3020-a, a teacher was suspended without pay for one year after being found guilty compromising the integrity of a standardized examination. [Decisions of the Commissioner of Education 11776]

The teacher had been charged with disclosing the essay topics of a standardized test to his class just prior to its participation in the ?New York State Writing Test.? The Section 3020-a disciplinary panel found the teacher guilty of the charge and recommended a three-month suspension without pay. The school district, on the other hand, wished to have the teacher dismissed and appealed the panel?s recommendation to the Commissioner of Education.

The Commissioner agreed with the school board that the penalty imposed by the hearing panel was disproportionately lenient in light of the misconduct involved. But he said that he was not convinced that dismissal was the appropriate penalty.

The Commissioner determined that a suspension without pay for one year was ?commensurate with the offense and sufficient to serve as a deterrent to future misconduct?, explaining that primary purpose of a Section 3020-a disciplinary hearing is not punitive but rather to determine a teacher?s fitness to teach and carry out his or her professional responsibilities.

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on September 17, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0138 secs (new cache)