ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Constitutional Law

: Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

Grafton Superior Judge Vaughn may issue a ruling soon on KingCast v. NH AG Ayotte/Franconia/Montminy in Franconia shooting tragedy coverup FOIA case.

By Christopher King

ADVERTISEMENTS
In this picture-only post I noted that Judge Vaughn has been busy as all get-out. In addition to him being busy in general, in specific there have been ongoing legal battles with Defendant Ayotte actually arguing that KingCast is not entitled to fingerprint evidence pertaining to whose prints are on the magazine of Liko Kenney's gun, as noted in this post, and in Piper v. United States DOJ, 294 F. Supp. 2d 16 (2003).
Exemption 7(C), 5 U.S.C.S. § 552(b)(7)(C), did not shield from disclosure a photograph of a smudged fingerprint that had been enhanced by the FBI and a related memorandum.....Whether this contradiction is blunder or subterfuge, the Court will not inquire at this time. The Court orders the FBI to release document 206.

And Defendant Ayotte certainly can't get away from the FACT that Gregory W. Floyd started shooting at Liko's car immediately, as our cameras have carefully noted the presence of the windshield bullet hole that her official sham report discusses dismisses in one quick sentence. He then, by his own admission, executed Liko "within four seconds," so any notion that Defendant Ayotte claims Floyd spoke with Liko prior to shooting is an absolute lie. Let me say it again:

NH AG Kelly Ayotte is responsible for positing a material lie in the investigation of the Franconia shooting tragedy between Liko Kenney, Bruce McKay and Gregory W. Floyd.

That having been said, His Honor did recently issue a Decision denying Dartmouth College's Motion to Dismiss against a lawsuit filed by the alumni association, a case I watched for a while before ours on 10 Jan, 2008, so in the rotation of things I'm sure he's working on it.

All of us are on pins and needles right now, you got that right because whatever his rulings are, its going to be a remarkable case both now and in the appeals that are likely to follow from any or all Parties.

And with that, I'm back to preparing for an 8 a.m. filing tomorrow for the Jesseman/KingCast v. Union Leader lawsuit, and preparing for the first organizational meeting on the Robert Taylor's Law legislation with Senator Tarr, State Rep Verga and Gloucester Mayor Kirk. Its going to be a fascinating week.

Related post: The voice of this blawg.
Related short film: Gil Scott-Heron and Live Revolution.

All prayers, Peace, Aloha, Namaste.

Full post as published by Chris King's 1st Amendment Page on February 24, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.022 secs (new cache)