ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Malpractice Blogs -> New York Attorney Malpractice Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Malpractice

: New York Attorney Malpractice Blog

Cases this Week in Legal Malpractice

By (Andrew Lavoott Bluestone)

ADVERTISEMENTS

Here are some NY state cases this week in Legal Malpractice:

1.Max Markus Katz, et al., appellants, v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., respondent.

APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT
2008 NY Slip Op 1507           February 19, 2008

This case demonstrates two potent defenses:  "we were fired before the end of the case, and the new attorneys could have fixed the problem..."

Plaintiffs argued that they were forced to settle a PI action for  than they could have recovered ,Defendants submitted evidence establishing that  the law firm's refusal to "pursue a highly questionable claim for exaggerated lost earnings damages" and "its purported delay in retaining an economist to evaluate the lost earnings claim" , had nothing to do with the the amount of the settlement  in the underlying action.

More telling, defendants were discharged and plaintiffs hired new counsel five months before they settled the underlying action.  The Court found  no proximate cause, and that "subsequent counsel had a sufficient opportunity to protect the clients' rights "

 

2.     Kathleen Velie, et al., appellants, v Ellis Law, P.C., 

 APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT
2008 NY Slip Op 1533; February 19, 2008

Here, in an underlying slip on ice case it seems that the defendant attorneys simply did not start the case within the statute of limitations period, With no discussion of the underlying case, or why they could have successfully sued the snow removal people or the property owners, the Appellate Division found that the defendant attorneys failed in their prima facie obligation in summary judgment.  Traditionally this means that there was no attorney's affidavit, or some especially important element of the motion for summary judgment was missing. This is surprising, in view of the identities of the defending and prosecuting attorneys, both of whom are powerhouses in the field.  Note that this Duchess county case attracted a significant NY plaintiff's law firm, and had a well known Westchester legal malpractice defense firm making the MSJ.

 

Full post as published by New York Attorney Malpractice Blog on February 28, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0026 secs (from cache 11/05/26 06:15:30)