Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Election-Campaign Law Blogs -> Election Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Election-Campaign Law
: Election UpdatesMore on differential turnout by mode and the implications for ballot measures
By Paul Gronke
Doug Chapin of the Pew Center on the States sent me this story from Nebraska. Like yesterday’s posting of DiCamillo’s article, the Nebraska pieces notes the dramatically different turnout rates for low level contests (in this case, non candidate ballot measures) when using vote by mail.
Interestingly, the story tries to cite a quasi-experimental demonstration of the effect. A local school board bond issue was voted on in three counties without voting by mail, and turnout was 35% (the bond lost with 81% voting no). A prison bond issue in a neighboring county was conducted fully by mail, and turnout was 49% (the percent voting no was not reported).
Of course, the problem with this comparison is that the issue on the ballot varied, not just the method of voting.
What we need to find in Nebraska is a multi-county issue where some voted by mail and others in person. Any ambitious graduate students out there at Lincoln?
Full post as published by Election Updates on November 16, 2009 (boomark / email).
Ballot Device
Election Systems and Software agrees to pays city of San Francisco $3.5 million settlement after problems with AutoMARK lead to prolonged hand counting of votes.

New California Ballot Measures Research Guide
Prop. 8 foes push new ballot measures to reverse gay marriage ban
Is Ben and Jerry's Inadvertently Breaking Federal Law
Alabama: high turnout in one county brings criminal investigation
2008 State Ballot Measures and Land Use
TransparentDemocracy goes Beta








