Constitutional Law

KingCast open letter #2 to Columbus Bar Association and Bruce Campbell, Esq.

By Christopher King

Thirteen months have passed since I asked you for the identity of anonymous complaining parties in New Hampshire, and for the disposition of same. You replied by telling me the file was confidential, then I waived confidentiality pursuant to Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neill, 75 Ohio St.3d 1479, 664 N.E.2d 532 Ohio 1996 as noted in this post. You held your position.

Therfore I was quite surprised to find the the Columbus Bar Association did indeed forward this very same information to my present adversary in a Civil Rights complaint -- an adversary that has allowed for Spoliation of Evidence I might add.

Can you please explain to me this apparent paradox? Surely Sam Shaulson and Citibank counsel have no more right to the information than I did? Please immediately email me the information that you provided to them because to me this resembles a Due Process/Fairness/Equal Protection issue of the Highest Order.

Caption: Client Michael Isreal, Bruce Campbell, Esq., Julie Davis, Esq., Ivery Forman, Esq. (arms crossed) at "American Lawyer" http://KingCast.net

We use video podcasting at KingCast.net and Justiceforkids.net to protect the First Amendment and highlight corporate and police abuse, such as the Ohio Board of Grievances, American Tower Corporation, Jaffrey Police Department, and the NAACP have all told material lies or unlawfully withheld evidence

Full post as published by Chris King's 1st Amendment Page on November 30, 2009 (boomark / email).