ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Constitutional Law

: Chris King's 1st Amendment Page

KingCast says even in Korea Citibank is "insincere," has no seoul and will discriminate with impunity.

By Christopher King

ADVERTISEMENTS
Citibank seems to think that anything I have done or was accused of in the past is somehow relevant to them discriminating against me today. Well then two can play that game, because in the same time span President Obama sued Citibank for unlawful discrimination (see link), Citibank employees passed racist literature and jokes and workers as far away as Seoul, Korea accused Citibank of lying and of unlawful discrimination and took the extraordinary measure of striking to prove it. It's Citibank's corporate culture, folks.

Citibank Workers Strike Over Discrimination Claims


"We have no choice but to strike since the management has been insincere in the past collective bargaining talks," the union said.

And then there is this little gem:
White vice presidents and lower-level employes of Citibank sent racist jokes throughout the megabank's interoffice E-mail, according to a lawsuit filed by enraged black workers.

The E-mail a series of spoofs on the black speech patterns known as Ebonics started at the bank's Wall Street offices and wound up at offices around New York and as far south as Florida.


See I know Citibank is either tacitly or directly working with the haters to get me on anything they can, and they are fighting tooth and nail to keep a video of them mistreating me out of YouTube. But once that video goes up (either with just my witnesses and me or with Manager Carlo Carmanna with or without blue dot) and people see that Citibank was lying:

a) about my composure in the bank

b) about who the Decision Maker was (Carlo Carmanna, a white man)

Things don't look so good for them, they look better for me, especially because Citibank's first line of response to my lawyer was to threaten us with production of the videos. Now they backpedal, see the Motion to Compel and related memoranda.

So Citibank is hoping and praying that MCAD will not release the video to me, simple. See today's MCAD Supplemental Surreply.

Lastly Citibank?s lies about the Decision Maker being black:

The attached job description for Branch Manager proves that only Carlo Carmanna has the authority to be the Decision Maker, and it reads, in pertinent part:

? Resolve escalated customer complaints/issues promptly and effectively.
(Attachment 2)

I asked my friend who knows her, and the teller?s name is Jan**** and she had nothing to do with the Decision, that?s why she never filed a written statement. This material will be forwarded to New York State Bar Counsel today via FEDEX.

Full post as published by Chris King's 1st Amendment Page on December 07, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0118 secs (new cache)