Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: IPKatPeer-to-Patent hits Australia
By Johanna Gibson, David Pearce, Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Simon.
The IPKat has discovered that one of his favourite concepts, Peer-to-Patent (see earlier posts here and here), has reached the fair and lovely land of Australia. Ben McEniery (Peer-to-Patent Australia Project Manager and a Lecturer in the Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology) tells him as follows: "Following on from the Peer-to-Patent projects run recently out of the New York Law School (NYLS) and the JPO comes Peer-to-Patent Australia. Peer-to-Patent Australia is a joint initiative of the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) and IP Australia that is designed to improve the patent examination process and the quality of issued patents.Peer-to-Patent Australia launched today, Wednesday 9 December 2009, and the IPKat fervently wishes it luck!Peer-to-Patent Australia is the result of the collaborative efforts of QUT and NYLS. The project will initially run as a 6-month pilot that will focus on the rapidly advancing technology areas of business methods and computer software. Up to 40 business method, computer software and related patent applications that have been filed in Australia and which are open for public inspection will each be posted on the Peer-to-Patent Australia website for a 90-day period. During that time, members of community can review those applications, submit prior art references and comment on the relevance of any prior art that has been put forward.
At the end of the review period, Peer-to-Patent Australia will forward the top 10 prior art submissions for each application, as selected by the community of reviewers, to IP Australia for consideration in the examination process. The review process in no way abrogates the responsibility of the patent examiner to assess a patent application. Prior art submitted by Peer-to-Patent Australia is solely designed to assist a patent examiner, who remains the arbiter of whether a patent is to be granted.
The project uses a consent based model. Patent applicants will be asked to consent to having their applications included in the pilot. There are currently seven applicants who have consented to participate. These are IBM, Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited, General Electric Company, Hewlett-Packard, Residex Pty Ltd, Yahoo and CSIRO. Those applicants have put forward 18 patent applications for peer review. 15 of those will be made available at the launch.
For those of you who would like to participate in the prior-art-search, sign up here".
Australian inventions here, here and (not for the faint-hearted) here
Full post as published by IPKat on December 09, 2009 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
Australia
Reported $4.5 million settlement for wrongful deportation.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment

Peer To Patent System May Become Model For Patent Offices
The bean-counting of peer-to-patent hits Hamilton
"Crowdsourcing" Patent Peer Review
USPTO extends peer review program to business method patents








