Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Prawfs
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: PrawfsFix the Senate
By Dan Markel, Ethan Leib, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Paul Horwitz , Steve Vladeck, and Orly Lobel
This comment by Steven Hill in the Financial Times aptly sums up my feelings about the U.S. Senate: "This powerful legislative body debating healthcare for the entire country is a patrician gerontocracy more closely resembling the ancient Roman Senate than a New England town meeting." Right on, my brother. The Senate, with its anti-majoritarian structure, its obstruction-enabling procedure and its general cluelessness, is a lot like David Hasselhoff: a queasy-making combination of self-love and ridiculousness.
This view is not new, particularly among law professors. So why isn't this sentiment more widely held? Some people hate individual politicians, and some hate the government as a whole, but few beyond the academy point to the Senate itself?as opposed to the House?as a dysfunctional institution. More specifically, most people are not interested in the Senate's design or procedure. From the public's point of view, this makes sense--who has the time to look under the hood when the government keeps crashing? Easier to get a new driver. But for academics interested in reform?and, indeed, for anyone interested in political change?the general public indifference to the Senate's institutional failings is a real problem.
Full post as published by Prawfs on December 12, 2009 (boomark / email).

A Constitutional Amendment Concerning Senate Vacancies
Montana Senate in Session - UPDATED
OK Senate Panel Approves Eligibility Bill
"Reid Prefers Senate Appointment to Special Election"
Blago, Burris, the Senate, and Powell v. McCormack
State Senate approves drug treatment bill that could allow diversion of felony drug offenses







