ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Truth on the Market

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Truth on the Market

Debating Google

ADVERTISEMENTS

Apologies for the late notice on this.  Last week I was on a Federalist Society panel discussing Google’s antitrust issues with Rick Rule, Susan Creighton and Scott Cleland.  The event description follows, and you can find audio of the panel here.  It was an interesting discussion, full of nice ironies in that Microsoft’s chief outside antitrust defender was attacking Google with theories similar to those used against him in the DOJ case, and Google’s chief outside antitrust defender was the author of antitrust case against Microsoft and author of the paper (on cheap exclusion) that was being used as the basis for the case against . . . Google.  Good fun.  Any thoughts from anyone who attended?

Is Google Monopolizing Something, and If So, What?

Federalist Society Corporations, Securities and Antitrust Practice Group

December 7, 2009Is Google Monopolizing Something, and If So, What?.  Last June, Christine Varney, then a lawyer in private practice, now President Obama’s nominee to be the next Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, warned that Google, not Microsoft, is the monopolist of the future.  ?For me, Microsoft is so last century. They are not the problem,” Varney said at a June 19 panel discussion sponsored by the American Antitrust Institute. The U.S. economy will ?continually see a problem — potentially with Google? because it already “has acquired a monopoly in Internet online advertising.”  Concerns of this nature ultimately led Tom Barnett, the last Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, to threaten a Sherman Act monopolization lawsuit if Google went through with plans to buy Yahoo.  Google, on the other hand, contends that the concerns are completely misplaced.  “The nature of the Internet is just a fundamentally different world from the sale of packaged software or the bundling of software with OEMs (original equipment manufacturers),” according to Kent Walker, Google?s General Counsel.  “The standard line we have is that competition is just one click away.”

[ Full Audio]
Audio Running Time: 01:32:58

Panelists:

  • Mr. Scott Cleland, President, Precursor LLC and Chairman, NetCompetition.org
  • Ms. Susan Creighton, Partner, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC
  • Prof. Geoffrey Manne, Founder and Executive Director, International Center for Law & Economics and Lecturer in Law, Lewis & Clark Law School
  • Mr. Rick Rule, Partner, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • Moderator: Mr. Montgomery N. Kosma, Vice President of Legal Services Outsourcing, CPA Global

Full post as published by Truth on the Market on December 17, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0166 secs (new cache)