Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Thoughts in a Haystack
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Thoughts in a HaystackBleedin' Obvious
By John Pieret
[A]ccording to a new academic paper ... [a]ngels can't fly.
A leading biologist has compared the physiology of flighted species with the representations of spiritual and mythical creatures in art ? and found the angels and fairies that sit atop of Christmas trees did not get there under their own steam.
Prof Roger Wotton, from University College London, found that flight would be impossible for angels portrayed with arms and bird-like feathered wings.
"Even a cursory examination of the evidence in representational arts shows that angels and cherubs cannot take off and cannot use powered flight," said Prof Wotton. "And even if they used gliding flight, they would need to be exposed to very high wind velocities at take off - such high winds that they would be blown away and have no need for wings.
.
Full post as published by Thoughts in a Haystack on December 22, 2009 (boomark / email).

M·CAM, Inc. Launches Patently Obvious® IP Assertion Defense Service
Stuart Taylor, Jr. and Evan Thomas on the Koh nomination
or, shall we say, major general obvious

What next






