ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: IPBiz

Stem cells: missing out on an economic boon?

By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS
The conclusion of Selling Stem Cell Science: How Markets Drive Law along the Technological Frontier [33 Am. J. L. and Med. 541 (2007)] states:

In the end, the promise of stem cell science will almost certainly prove too alluring for the law to resist. Pushed by private investors and the demands of those who stand to benefit, federal and state restrictions on stem cell research will decline, allowing latter-stage markets to once again trump the moral concerns occasioned by radical technology. Just how quickly this gap will close, however, and how expensive it will be, remain to be seen.

There is text:

Meanwhile, even slow progress in California has led other parts of the country to worry about a potential "brain drain" of top researchers. n195 Gerald Fischbach, dean of Columbia's Medical School, has predicted "an enormous sucking action to California. n196 Other states have rushed to follow California's lead, fearful of missing out on the potential economic boon from stem cells. n197 In May 2004, for instance, Governor James McGreevey of New Jersey announced plans to create a state-funded stem cell institute and provide $ 50 million over five years for research. n198 In December of 2005, New Jersey became the first state to actually fund this research when its Commission on Science and Technology divided $ 5 million in grants among seventeen research teams. n199 Connecticut announced its intention to spend $ 100 million over the next ten years for embryonic and adult stem cell research in June of 2005; in March 2006, the Republican governor of Maryland agreed to sign a bill passed by the Democratic legislature to use state funds for embryonic stem cell research. n200 Other states have subsequently followed suit. n201

The article by Spar and Harrington did not mention the words "Hwang" or "fraud", and the article did not cite 88 JPTOS 239 (2006). Presumably the manuscript was already completed when New Jersey voters rejected the stem cell bond issue in November 2007.

Full post as published by IPBiz on March 02, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 11/06/26 23:10:22)