Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentM.D.Pa.: Brady applies to suppression hearings
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
The fact defendant was dealing drugs from her former residence justifies the conclusion that she would be dealing drugs from her current residence. The affidavit for the search warrant showed probable cause. Impeachment evidence under Brady should have been turned over to the defense before the suppression hearing. In this case, however, it would not make a difference in the outcome. United States v. Best, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119802 (M.D. Pa. December 23, 2009).*
Defendant was overheard being told by his brother to bring “snow bunny” into a prison visit as USP-Pollock so his brother could barter for protection. Thus, the prison officials had reasonable suspicion for him when he showed up. Defense counsel was, thus, not ineffective for not challenging his search...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on December 31, 2009 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Second Circuit Reverses Bribery Conviction Due to Governments Suppression of Brady Material
Another example of poor writing
Prosecutors Seek Mulligan in Zhenli Ye Gon Prosecution
New Evidence May Allow Second Suppression Hearing








