ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> AFL-CIO NOW BLOG

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: AFL-CIO NOW BLOG

Health Insurance CEO?s $73 Million Bonus Covers a Lot of Co-Pays?and Other Health Care News

By Mike Hall

ADVERTISEMENTS
 
   

Millions of working families are struggling to pay the ever-rising costs of health care or going without, and they await what Congress will do with health care reform.

But one person who won’t have to worry about the final shape of health care legislation is H. Edward Hanway. He just retired as CEO and chairman of the board of the health insurance behemoth CIGNA.

Even if his co-pays double and his deductibles and premiums rise, his $73 million retirement bonus?not to mention $12 million compensation in 2009?should take care of those pesky increases. Read more at the Health Care Journal of Northern California.M

Meanwhile, the House and Senate leaders are meeting this evening with President Obama to try to hash out the next steps in the health care battle, now that both houses have passed bills with significant differences.

One of the biggest differences in the Senate bill is a new tax on the health benefits of working families to help pay for reform.  Instead of a tax on working families that some estimate could impact as many as 40 percent of families with insurance over the next few years, the House bill uses a tax surcharge on individuals making $500,000 a year or families with an annual $1 million income. Compare the two bills here.

The latest poll from Rasmussen Reports shows that a huge majority of the general public agrees with the AFL-CIO and other advocates of real reform that the Senate tax on benefits should be scrapped. The poll finds 59 percent opposed to the tax and 64 percent in favor of a tax surcharge on the wealthiest.

Advocates for the excise tax on health benefits claim it would only apply to so-called high-cost “Cadillac plans.” But an analysis by Maggie Mahar at Health Beat shows the real victims of the tax are those of us with Ford, Chevy and Dodge plans. Read more here.

Meanwhile, in a classic case of good news and bad news, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services reports that health care spending in the United States rose in 2008 at its slowest pace in nearly 50 years. But as Merrill Goozner points out on his health care blog, Gooznews on Health:

Don’t break out the champagne quite yet. The slowdown was fed by a million people being dumped from insurance rolls as unemployment skyrocketed. The most important fact about last year’s 4.4 percent growth in health care spending (down from 6 percent in 2007) was that it still outpaced overall economic growth by a nearly two-to-one margin.

With both the House and Senate not due back in session until later this month, the content of the final health care reform bill is a guessing game. But we will keep you posted.

Full post as published by AFL-CIO NOW BLOG on January 05, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0184 secs (new cache)