ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> inversecondemnation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Real Estate & Property Law

: inversecondemnation

New SCOTUS Cert Petition From Kauai: Is Surrender Clause In State Lease A Taking?

By Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)

ADVERTISEMENTS

Recently, the owners of vacation cabins located on leased land in a state park on the island of Kauai filed a cert petition which asks the U.S. Supreme Court to review an unpublished decision of the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals which held that the State did not run afoul of the Takings Clause when it required the owners to surrender their cabins at the end of the lease.

The trial court determined that the lessees had no property interest when their leases expired. The Hawaii Supreme Court declined review of the ICA's disposition.

The lessees' petition is available here, and presents the following question:

QUESTION PRESENTED

The State of Hawaii owns land in Kokee State Park on the island of Kauai. Petitioners, have leasehold estates in parcels on the land and own private cabins thereon. Each Petitioner, or his or her predecessor in interest, bought, built or inherited his or her private cabin. Collectively, the cabins are worth several million dollars. In 1985 when the prior land leases expired, the State required Petitioners, as a condition of retaining their leasehold interests in the land to sign 20-year land leases containing a clause whereby Petitioners would be required to surrender their pre-existing residence cabins to the State in 2006, when the 1985 lease expired -- and receive no compensation in return.

Question Presented

Whether a state may escape its constitutional obligation to pay just compensation for the taking of a citizen's pre-existing private property, by requiring the un-compensated surrender of the citizen's private property as a contract term in a land lease, where the lease contains no knowing, voluntary, clear or intelligent waiver of the constitutional right to just compensation -- and where the state would have taken the same private property without just compensation if the lease was not signed, as drafted by the State.

Petition at i-ii (emphasis original).

Full post as published by inversecondemnation on January 20, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0156 secs (new cache)